The hutting movement is saying that it's ok to own a 'cabin in the woods' as a holiday home. That it's actually a good thing for people from cities to reconnect with nature and the countryside in this way. That planning law is stifling this unnecessarily. That Scandanavian countries where this is far more common haven't got it wrong: something like half of Norwegians have the use of a hut in the countryside that they or their extended family owns.
It feels like too often we're kowtowing to some kind of puritanical agenda that says that second homes and rural development etc are "sinful", rather than something that makes people's lives better.
Log cabins in a few hectares of woodland wouldn't amount to tarmacing the countryside.