RhodOdendron (spelling, Teech!) has little or nothing to recommend it in terms of UK ecological value, as far as I\'m aware, apart from being an ideal hiding place for shier creatures such as nightingales, and is also a serious inhibitor of other interesting growth beneath it.
Bracken, however, is rather more useful, providing as it does shelter from predators and the weather to mammals large (fox, deer etc) and small (mice, voles etc) as well as being ideal cover for reptiles such as adders, which are commonly encountered on the acidic soils loved by bracken.
I get the impression, Tracy, that you probably \"find it a pain\" because it makes your coppicing work difficult, which is certainly a valid point! I would have thought though, that this practical point apart, maintaining a diverse structure in our woodland ecosystem would be fairly high on the agenda of we woodland managers, unless we are seeking to promote a specialised habitat of some sort. I also manage a KWT chalk downland nature reserve, which is obviously a specialised grassland system, but our policy is still to diversify where we can, by creating a \"mosaic\" of vegetation cover, in terms of type, quantity, size etc. In fact, although we periodically treat a small area of bracken on the woodland scarp to keep it from taking over, I still find it a charming and vital piece of the total jigsaw! I was thrilled to record our first White Admiral butterfly in the bracken glade last summer, which Steve will probably confirm is not unexpected when coppiced woodland is neglected to some extent, allowing it to become more shaded and enclosed.
On a final note, there are at least a half dozen moth species whose larvae include bracken as a food resource! Here endeth the lesson.............