I understand that 'commercially run' woodland is exempt from inheritance tax, and if this is so, it is clearly an attractive notion. The woodland which we currently own is only three-and-a-half acreas in extent and is managed as a nature reserve, so there's no commercial element to it. However, it occurred to me that if we were to buy, say, 10 acres of grassland and plant trees all over it with the declared intent of harvesting the timber in due course (which would probably be in thirty or so years' time, by which time we'll be long gone) our children will have a useful pension based on the sale of the timber (not to mention the value of the land), and will have avoided paying inheritance tax on the woodland we have created and passed on to them. In addition, we shall have the pleasure of creating a new woodland. Am I right? Where's the catch?