We have recently bought a woodland which has been neglected for at least fifty years.
A ditch runs through it which is classified as an "ordinary watercourse"
This ditch drains the surface water from a substantial part of the local common plus the adjoining highway and two residential roads.
It runs from the adjoining highway to the river about one kilometre away entirely within our woodland.
The ditch had not been cleared properly for many years with the result that the outlet from the highway was silted up and the rest of the ditch was full of leaves etc. causing the water to flood the land.
Under Section 25 of the Land Drainage Act 1991 we are legally obliged to keep this ditch free from all obstructions otherwise the County Council can take action against us and send in their own contractors to carry out the work and invoice us for their trouble.
During clearing the ditch I found two substantial roots from an oak tree which is on my neighbour's land; these were completely blocking the ditch from top to bottom.
I cut these roots out completely and then my neighbour appeared and informed me the tree had a TPO on it.
He indicated that he was going to inform the TPO officer so I did that myself and received a visit this week and will eventually hear what they decide to do about it.
My point is that I am clearly caught between two contradictory laws - either clear the ditch and fall foul of the TPO or leave the ditch blocked and be penalised by the Land Drainage Act.
Re-routing the ditch is not an option in this case at it would affect another TPO tree.
Your thoughts on this problem would be appreciated.