Another planning nightmare
Log store in my woodland about 8 feet square by 8 feet high (all logs from my own woodland) ; a post at each corner, plastic sheeting roof and lengths of bamboo around the sides to hold the logs in and allow ventilation.
Just received a letter from local planners for alleged breach of planning regulations requesting me to remove it or apply for retrospective permission. This will cost me money.
I am sure this is at the prompting of a neighbour I had to warn off for encroachment onto the woodland and is a looking for some petty revenge.
It cannot be seen from any public areas and is not near any residential boundaries.
During the course of my conversation with a planning officer I discovered that a log pile would be OK as would a log pile covered with a tarpaulin as these can not be considered structures.
There seems to be no limit to the size of any potential log pile as long as it is my own timber so the complainant could end up regretting their action.
Does anybody know if there is legal definition for structures in woodland?
This is my second problem with planners.
I wanted to erect a small tool store for chainsaws etc. about two years ago which would have been completely invisible to the public but I would have been required to apply for full planning permission and that would have been a public document so all the local thieves would have known exactly where to go for their Christmas shopping.
Common sense doesn't have a place in planning law.