Small Woodland Owners' Group

Mud and tracks

Topics that don't easily fit anywhere else!

Mud and tracks

Postby Andy & Heather » Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:20 pm

Reading the discussion about the best tyres for muddy tracks, I was wondering: has anyone actually used their permitted development rights and put in a hard surfaced forestry access track? This would presumably be accessible at all times of year. What about a network of rides with proper drainage ditches to keep them dry? I know it can get very expensive if you have to buy stone in, but putting in a network of grass rides does not seem too bad, and yet I don't often read about people doing so. Am I missing something?
Interested to know what others have done as we are hoping to put in a track and some rides.
Heather
Andy & Heather
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:59 am

Re: Mud and tracks

Postby Chunkymunky » Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:34 pm

There are some grants available for creating access for some woods
Chunkymunky
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:59 am

Re: Mud and tracks

Postby Meadowcopse » Wed Feb 20, 2013 9:24 pm

Depending on how your land is registered on the Rural Land Register (not Land Registry), the construction of hard surfaces have to be declared on your plan and can affect SFP, ELS / HLS
Meadowcopse
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:13 am
Location: Cheshire

Re: Mud and tracks

Postby Chunkymunky » Wed Feb 20, 2013 9:47 pm

Obviously there is a variety of materials you can use and the description of hard surface leaves some out. Laying bark for instance wouldn't be a problem because it wouldn't be a permanent surface
Chunkymunky
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:59 am

Re: Mud and tracks

Postby Meadowcopse » Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:34 pm

Depending how your land is registered with them (particularly farmland not in a forestry scheme, but planted with trees or in the process of), Number 24 could be relevant in the link http://rpa.defra.gov.uk/rpa/index.nsf/contentdocs/0DE30F7D95824972880256F8600321C26
Meadowcopse
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:13 am
Location: Cheshire

Re: Mud and tracks

Postby Andy & Heather » Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:17 pm

Depending how your land is registered with them (particularly farmland not in a forestry scheme, but planted with trees or in the process of), Number 24 could be relevant in the link http://rpa.defra.gov.uk/rpa/index.nsf/c ... 8600321C26


Thanks for this. Don't think it will make much difference in our case because the stoned track will only be 100m long by 3m wide.

As for grants for putting in tracks: as far as we can work out, and it may be different here in Wales, you will only get help with putting in access tracks if you allow public access. To some extent that seems fair, why should we be paid to put tracks in private woodlands? But if it is possible, then we would like to hear more!

Heather
Andy & Heather
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:59 am

Re: Mud and tracks

Postby Chunkymunky » Thu Feb 21, 2013 4:38 pm

There is an informative section on grants on woodland.co.uk

http://www.woodlands.co.uk/owning-a-wood/grants/
Chunkymunky
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:59 am

Re: Mud and tracks

Postby docsquid » Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:12 pm

Our woodland is very wet and we have put in some forestry tracks, both Cat1 and Cat2. We got a grant for this from the FC, even though access is only permissive on certain days/times, and not universal. Because our whole woods are covered by a TPO, we had to get planning permission, but this was put in as a block of permissions for a building to house equipment, ponds, fences and tracks. The FC do not like tracks going in ancient woodland, but in our case were convinced that the potential damage was greater if we didn't put them in, as we wouldn't be able to get down to manage the lower part of our wood, or would try and cause tree root and soil damage. When building the tracks, we ensured that all the soil was kept on the site, along with its associated seed. The tracks are now greening up nicely and you would be hard pressed to realise they are vehicle capable.
docsquid
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:37 pm

Re: Mud and tracks

Postby SimonFisher » Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:35 pm

docsquid wrote:Our woodland is very wet and we have put in some forestry tracks, both Cat1 and Cat2 ... [snip] ... The tracks are now greening up nicely and you would be hard pressed to realise they are vehicle capable.


What's the construction method and materials of these tracks? You have any photos?
SimonFisher
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:00 pm

Re: Mud and tracks

Postby Andy & Heather » Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:08 pm

I was going to ask a similar question. Also, what do Cat 1 and Cat 2 actually stand for?

What type of soil were you working with? We have clay soils and have been told we will need 2 tonnes of foundation stone (4" and down) for each running metre of our 3m wide track - that is a lot of stone! The contractor is then recommending that we cap it with 'MOT grade 1' to give us a surface that is suitable for a family car all year round and wheelchairs/mobility scooters. Is that fairly similar to your construction?

We have had no problem with the FC because our woodland is a clearfelled conifer plantation with natural regeneration. We were able to clear a way for the track this weekend using loppers and handsaws! The Enviromental Impact Assessment and Permitted Development of a forest access track seem to be going though no problem.
Andy & Heather
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:59 am


Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron