greyman wrote:So, do you think all these tales of mangled body parts, near death experiences lead us to any conclusions? Do you think a selection of these set us up suitably to be woodland owners or is it a bit of Darwinism - those that survive etc?
I think regular tales of near misses etc will keep us all a bit more focused. It may mean the difference between putting gloves on, or not - for example.
We can all expect a few minor injuries, it's the 'life changing / ending' ones to try to avoid.
I was discussing, in work, about my level of sympathy is diminished with smokers who end up with their larynx being removed - a colleague told me that's the same as her level of sympathy will be diminished if I injure myself with a chainsaw. We all make lifestyle choices that change our 'risk profile' of potential injuries.
I have a less than average chance of a smoking related tumour, about average chance of being injured in a car crash and above average chance of a chainsaw / axe injury. We all live with these choices, even if we don't think about them.
The problem with Darwinism is that we (forum readers) tend towards the older end of the scale, and have already 'bred'. Whatever happens to us, the genes have been passed on. Stupid deaths in our cohort shouldn't make any evolutionary difference.